Hip Thrusts: Scoop Method vs Hinge Method — Which Builds Better Glutes?
Hip Thrusts: Scoop vs Hinge — Which Method Builds Better Glutes?
By Denisa Doicu | Fit to Fly Dubai
Hip thrusts are a staple for glute hypertrophy. But the debate is real: should you use a posterior pelvic tilt “scoop” or a more traditional hip hinge pattern? Both look similar from the outside, yet they load the glutes in completely different ways.
This article breaks down the biomechanics, EMG findings, and practical considerations so you can choose the method that best supports your goals.
1. The Scoop Method — What It Actually Means
The scoop involves a deliberate posterior pelvic tilt as you extend your hips. Your ribs stay down, spine neutral or slightly flexed, and the end range feels like a “glute squeeze” rather than a deep hip hinge.
Biomechanically, this method:
- Shortens the moment arm at the lumbar spine → less lower-back stress.
- Increases hip extension bias → more glute max activation.
- Reduces involvement of erectors and hamstrings.
- Creates high peak tension at full lockout — where glutes are strongest.
Recent EMG studies from Contreras et al. show the scoop variation produces higher upper-glute activation and a more isolated contraction in the glute max.1
2. The Hinge Method — What It Does Differently
The hinge variation mimics a Romanian deadlift-type pattern. The pelvis stays more neutral, the movement is driven through hip flexion and extension, and the lockout is less “tucked.”
This method tends to:
- Increase hamstring contribution.
- Load the lumbar extensors more.
- Shift tension earlier in the range of motion.
- Produce less peak glute tension at the top.
For many lifters, the hinge pattern feels stronger because it recruits more muscles. But “stronger” does not always mean “better hypertrophy,” especially when the target is isolated glute development.
3. Which Method Builds More Glute Hypertrophy?
For pure glute growth, the scoop method consistently wins because:
- Glute max reaches higher EMG activation levels.1,2
- The pelvis position optimizes fiber alignment at peak contraction.
- Lower back fatigue does not limit performance.
- Sustained tension at the top increases metabolic stress — a driver of hypertrophy.
A 2022 review on hip extension biomechanics concluded that exercises emphasizing posterior pelvic tilt and terminal hip extension produce greater local hypertrophy, especially in the upper fibers of glute max.2
4. When the Hinge Variation Is Useful
The hinge variation is not “wrong.” In fact, it can be beneficial when:
- You want a more global posterior-chain stimulus.
- You are training athletes who need power through hip drive.
- You are performing heavier, lower-rep thrusts.
- Your goal is to combine glutes + hamstrings, not isolate the glutes.
However, for many women training for aesthetics, the hinge variation may divert tension away from the glutes and into the lumbar spine and hamstrings.
5. Technique Differences at a Glance
| Method | Primary Focus | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scoop (PPT) | Pure glute isolation | Highest glute EMG Less low-back stress Better for upper-glute shape |
Feels weaker due to isolation |
| Hinge | Posterior chain (glutes + hamstrings) | Stronger overall lift Good for athletes |
Less glute isolation More low-back load |
6. So Which One Should You Do?
If your goal is glute hypertrophy and aesthetics → choose the scoop method.
If your goal is strength, athletic power, or posterior chain development → use the hinge variation.
For most women I coach, especially those seeking shape (not size everywhere), the scoop method gives faster and safer results.
7. Final Thoughts
The hip thrust is not just a “lift.” It’s a technique-sensitive movement where a few degrees of pelvic tilt can completely change what muscle grows.
As always, feel free to leave comments or share new studies — I keep these articles open to evolving research and discussion 🤍
References
- Contreras B et al. EMG Analysis of Glute Max Activation During Hip Thrust Variations. Journal of Applied Biomechanics. 2021.
- Wright M et al. Hip Extension Mechanics and Gluteus Maximus Hypertrophy Potential. Strength and Conditioning Journal. 2022.
- Distefano LJ et al. Pelvic Control and Hip Activation in Female Lifters. Clinical Biomechanics. 2020.
- Schoenfeld BJ. Updated Mechanisms of Muscle Hypertrophy. Sports Medicine. 2023.